100%
Why we exist
The Gulf moves a great deal of value peer-to-peer, and most of it moves on trust that has nothing to hold it up.
Someone sends first. Sometimes the other side performs, and sometimes they do not. The losses are quiet, rarely reported, and almost never recovered, and the people most exposed are the ones least able to absorb it.
Escrow is an old, unglamorous answer to that problem. It works. What it has lacked in this region is anyone willing to run it transparently: published fees, published timelines, a named company, and a mechanism you can verify rather than a promise you have to accept.
Company details
Who holds the third key
You are trusting a company with a signature on your funds. You should be able to see the faces attached to it.
Two separations are deliberate. The Dispute Lead is not the Operations Lead, so nobody decides a dispute on a deal they ran. The CISO is not the Compliance Officer, so the person securing the keys is not the person auditing whether they were secured. Both are requirements, not preferences.
Three commitments
We publish what others hide
Fees as text. Dispute timelines with real numbers. Our regulatory position stated plainly rather than implied.
We claim only what we can show
Where we do not yet have the evidence (an audit, an insurer, a certification) we say so rather than reaching for a vaguer word.
We decide on the record
Disputes are settled against the terms both parties accepted at the start, not against whoever argues hardest afterwards.
Tell us about the deal
Asset, amount, both parties, delivery terms. We will confirm whether we can act and exactly what it costs before you commit to anything.